With climate change being a hot button issue these days, there are many Hofstra University students who want to see change from their local and national politicians. Being that the United Nations released their 2018 report saying we only have a limited amount of time before climate change effects all of us, people need to take action, and one way to do that is by going out to cast your vote. In order for there to be any change there needs to be commitment and responsibility taken for how we treat our Earth. We only have one planet so we need to take care of it with the love it deserves.
A flooded basement, hundreds of pictures and possessions destroyed, a family heartbroken at the loss of their home. This is just a small aftermath of the storm, known as Hurricane Sandy, that struck Long Island and its surrounding areas six years ago. Over the years, families have had to pick themselves up, carrying with them the burden of rebuilding their homes as well as their lives.
“There was water everywhere,” says Rebecca Gonzalez, 20, a Staten Island resident. “My basement was completely flooded. Everything that was in the basement was lost and nothing was able to be recovered because there was too much damage.”
Gonzalez, a Hofstra University student, does remember the government helping out in some way, but she recalls many FEMA letters being rejected. She says, “It was a topic of conversation amongst our neighborhood. You would always ask for updates from each other and if they had a success, you would ask what they did [to see what] you didn’t do.”
“What would you want the government to do if you were in a tough situation?”
Today, Gonzalez lives with the memories of Superstorm Sandy, which have influenced her perspective on the environment. She says, “Now that I’ve experienced something like Sandy, the destruction and aftermath has taught me that there are a lot of precautions that could be done in order to weaken the damage if something were to happen again. For those that don’t think the environment is an important issue, they need to think about what if it happened to them – what would you want the government to do if you were in a tough situation?”
As polling day quickly approaches, Long Islanders now have the opportunity to vote for politicians that will speak up for the environment. Luckily, legislative voting records for Nassau and Suffolk county politicians are available for the public to see, which can help come November. Specifically, the elections for the House of Representatives in District 2 and District 4 are important to highlight, not only because they are local to this area, but the incumbents are not worried about the election. Yet, with their confidence so high and voting records public, individuals can decide whether they deserve to stay.
View this post on Instagram
Throughout my years in #Congress, I have been a strong advocate for the #conservation of Long Island’s land and water. I have made it a top priority to protect our coastal area's environmental assets including the South Shore and #LongIslandSound. I support legislation aimed to improve and restore #water quality in the #LongIsland Sound and conduct studies to strengthen the implementation of Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (Long Island Sound Improvement Act). This Act also helps to develop strategies to increase public education and awareness with respect to the ecological health and water quality of the Sound. I have remained committed to securing funding for the protection of the Long Island Sound. Superstorm Sandy was the second largest natural disaster in our nation’s history and the most devastating and costly to affect #NewYork and Long Island. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, this damage is equivalent to 30 years of #erosion. The resulting exposure has left our #shoreline vulnerable to even moderate storms, and must be addressed immediately. The $61 billion Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, for which I fought in the House of Representatives, includes $5.3 billion in funding for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake both emergency and long-term #beach restoration projects. I was proud to lead the fight to acquire funds to restore and fortify our shoreline. You can be certain that I will continue to work hard to ensure that our #environment is protected and safeguarded for future generations. (Photo courtesy of longisland.com)
For instance, District 2 Representative, Peter “Pete” King, claims to be a man for the environment. In a statement on his political website, he says, “I support legislation [that] aims to improve and restore water quality in the Long Island Sound while conducting studies to strengthen the implementation of the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan.” Yet, his voting record begs to differ. Over the course of his political career, he has been three times more likely to approve legislation that is anti-environment than pro-environment. According to the League of Conservation Voters Scorecard, his lifetime score is 16%, showing his actions don’t align with his words.
“If we fail [to] significantly reduce carbon pollution…we will experience…more intense weather events in the future.”
On the other hand, District 4 Representative, Kathleen Rice, has quite the opposite voting record in comparison to King. According to the League of Conservation Voters Scorecard, her lifetime score is 95%. From helping those who were affected by Sandy to expressing concern about the environment in general, Rice has emphasized the importance of being aggressive when it comes to protecting our world and the issue of climate change. She says in a political statement on her website, “There is no doubt that if we fail [to] significantly reduce carbon pollution, sea levels with keep rising and we will experience more frequent and more intense weather events in the future.”
With politicians in office that are on both sides of the spectrum, it is up to the public to go out and vote for the issues that they are concerned about. Yet, millennials have one of the lowest turnout rates when it comes to voting. According to a Newsweek article, “only 16 percent of eligible voters between the ages of 18 and 29 bothered” to show up to vote in the 2014 midterm election.
Craig Burnett, an assistant professor of political science at Hofstra University, says the reason why many people do not vote is because they have their eyes on the prize aka the presidency. He says, “Many people are only watching for the presidency. That’s [like only] watching the major sporting events, for example, the World Series or the Super Bowl.”
“Every individual action matters.”
Fortunately, that is where people like Adrienne Esposito come in, who, along with her team, help to educate those in making their own decisions when it comes to voting, especially when dealing with the environment.
Esposito, who is the executive director of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment believes that it is the job of Long Islanders to understand what is happening in their hometowns and how they can institute change. She says, “Every individual action matters. Every person who makes a small change contributes to the overall change.”
As part of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, Esposito educates society on the scientific issues relating to climate change. She also does not shy away from emphasizing the importance of contacting elected officials in your area to express concerns. Esposito says, “Elected officials respond to what the public is talking about. Younger people need to call their senate assembly offices and ask them what they are doing about climate change.”
For young individuals who are looking to make a change, especially in regards to the environment, Burnett has one piece of advice: show up to vote on election day. He says, “Younger people care about the environment; they tend to be more liberal on issues and they don’t [view] the current administration as pursuing policies they want them to pursue. It’s about taking this dissatisfaction and activating it in a way that turns up on election day.”
As a journalist, when you put your work out there for the world to see, you obviously want the world to care. Yet, in order for people to care about your story, you need to have one worth caring about to begin with.
This is what Mark Blaine discusses in the second chapter of his book, The Digital Reporter’s Notebook. With the chapter titled, ‘Why Do I Care?’, Blaine gets to the nitty gritty of writing stories that people will actually care to read. He ultimately says that stories need three things: Quality, Novelty, and Usefulness. Readers should be getting a story that is reliable with multiple trustworthy sources, contains new information, and this information could actually be used to help them.
Once a story has these three main components and the assembly of it has been decided, then it is time to develop the story further. You have the information — the facts, quotes, etc. — according to Blaine, this is where the story truly comes alive because you add context to bring everything together. The context of the story allows the reader to develop empathy for the “characters” in the story. This makes your story even richer and keeps the reader intrigued about the topic of your story.
Blaine ends his discussion by encouraging writers to reach out to their audience and get feedback in order to grow as a writer. He calls it an “on-the-fly focus group”, which is something all budding and veteran journalists can learn to do.
Opening Image: Photo by Bonnie Kittle on Unsplash
There is no doubt that social media has taken the world by storm. With constant talk about who posted what on Instagram or that funny cat video your aunt shared on Facebook, it seems as though social media is everywhere now.
With the founding of Facebook in 2004, there has been a steady increase over the 12 years in social media users for all age groups, according to studies done by the Pew Research Center. As expected, when social media was in its early stages, the most common group of users were those in the 18-29 year old age group with a small, but mighty 12 percent of users.
Although overall social media use has increased, it is interesting to point out that the percentage of users in the 18-29 year old age group has plateaued since 2013 in comparison to the 65+ age group which has witnessed an increase in social media use: from 26 percent in 2013 to 34 percent in 2016.
Source: Pew Research Center
When looking strictly at the social media use of 2016, it is clear that Facebook has the greatest use in comparison to other platforms, such as Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn and Pinterest. In addition, the social media platform, Instagram, has the greatest age gap with 59 percent of users belonging to the 18-29 year old age group and only 8 percent of users in the 65+ age group.
Source: Pew Research Center
Only time will tell if social media will continue to reign supreme. With more and more people going on the grid each day, it is obvious that these platforms will continue to change throughout the future. Until then, catch me sending out tweets to my favorite celebrities and of course, getting that aesthetically pleasing Instagram feed.
With the anticipation of the results of the French presidential election in full swing, NY Times used maps and graphs to help readers understand the results thus far. How did they do? Well, let’s take a look.
In an article titled, “How the Election Split France”, readers get a brief description as to what the first round of voting results are with pictures of the candidates and their poll ratings provided, followed by two maps of France, each demonstrating the areas of support for the top two candidates: Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen. Using blue to represent Macron and red for Le Pen, the illustrator used lighter shades to represent less support and a darker shade for greater support. The maps provide enough information to show where each candidate received more support since it is obvious there was greater support based on the darker color of that specific area.
The article also includes a map of France where a color represents each of the candidates. However, this map can be interpreted incorrectly because the map shows a significantly greater amount of salmon (representing Le Pen) than baby blue (representing Macron), yet Macron received a greater percentage (24.0% compared to Le Pen’s 21.3%). Also, the map includes a color for Jean Lassalle and not Benoît Hamon, even though they mention Hamon in the article and not Lassalle.
The final component of the article focuses on how neither the Socialist or Republican party will win the election this year and then using a graph to show that between the 2012 and 2017 elections, there was an influx in support of “Other parties”.
Overall, the article did a decent job in displaying the results of the election. I thought the colors were helpful in the first graphic, but not as effective in the second graphic since the colors were misleading to the results and there was some confusion involving the candidates.
Yet, the reader can takeaway from the article that this election is close and a game changer.
In a world full of stress and chaos, some find their outlet through dance and some of these people go by the name of Christiana Mangiapane.
Since she was two years old, Christiana has embraced this art, particularly through ballet, but enjoys tap as well. Not only is she a dancer, but her two younger sisters, Victoria and Arianna, are dancers as well, where they take after their mother, who danced her entire life.
Dancing serves as a stress reliever for Christiana, where no matter how hard she tries, she knows that she will eventually achieve her goals through dance because she is just that passionate about it.
For years to come, Christiana says that she will always keep dance as a part of her life, even encouraging her future children one day to follow the same path she did.
To see the interview and Christiana’s beautiful dancing, click below.
With so many videos on the Internet, it is difficult for some viewers to find actual news stories on Facebook. However, with BuzzFeed News’ ability to captivate their audience through their videos, it comes as no surprise that when needing to write about a non-broadcast video story from a news site, one would go to BuzzFeed News.
One of their more recent videos, titled This Robot is ACTUALLY Delivering Food in California, has received over 143k views in less than 24 hours since its upload.
How come a video like this has received so many views? For starters, the topic is quite intriguing considering the idea of robots delivering food seems impossible, but the way BuzzFeed News puts together the video enables the viewer to stay and watch the entire two minutes and 17 seconds.
The first shot, a man sitting on a bench as a robot rolls down the sidewalk followed by the man trying to steal the robot, but failing to do so. The video then cuts to the man saying “Robot – 1 Human – 0” which leads the viewer to think: Well, what’s going to happen next? BuzzFeed News then provides more information through text on the screen as the viewer watches a variety of shots of the robot rolling around Los Angeles, enabling the viewer to visualize how the robot would actually work. The interview with the associate of Starship Technologies also adds an intriguing perspective to the video because the viewer can learn about the brains behind this concept. Plus, they keep the story upbeat and fun with the techno music that plays in the background.
Through the use of text as well as a variety of up close, medium and over-the-shoulder shots, BuzzFeed News provides the audience an insight as to how cool it would be to have robots delivering our food. Now, where do I sign up?